In April 2009, the FDA approved the release of Dysport , a botulilnum serotype A neurotoxin used for cosmetic and medical treatments. Dysport is used cosmetically to treat glabbelar lines associated with procerus and corrugators muscle hyper-activity in adult patients less than 65 years of age. In other words, it is used to soften the appearance of wrinkles between the eyebrows. Medically, Dysport is indicated for the treatment of adults with cervical dystonia, which causes severe abnormal head positions and neck pain. Dysport has certainly stirred up media-frenzies in that it uses a similar serotype A botulinum toxin, as Botox Cosmetic, which temporarily reduces the appearance of fine lines and wrinkles by reducing movement in the muscles. This product was available a few years ago, but Allergan purchased the company who had the rights to sell it. Due to anti-trust laws in the United States, they were forced to give up distribution rights; which conveniently positioned Allergan as the sole provider of neurotoxin A. This time, Allergan’s rival Medicis (distributors of Restylane), intends to distribute Dysport.
Dysport vs. Botox injections:
One of the main arguments supporting Dysport injections is that it diffuses more readily into the injection site than Botox injections. What does this mean? Let’s say that you are looking to treat forehead lines. With Dysport, patients may need less than with Botox injections. Fewer injections results in less bruising and less product, which means cheaper Botox injection costs for consumers.
Another strong difference is the “needle to results time”. Studies show that patients using Dysport benefit in as little as a few hours; Botox® injections take an average of 5-21 days. With fast results, anyone receiving Dysport injections by day will appreciate their results before a big night out in Austin! Here is another advantage, Dysport injections may last between 4-6 months, wow!
One of the most advantageous differences of Dysport is its price per unit. Due to the recent recession, many Americans are hesitant to pursue their beauty needs. However, Dysport may be the perfect solution for those seeking to achieve a refreshed appearance without breaking the bank. A Dysport frown line treatment costs about $200 a session; whereas, Botox® injections cost about $300 a session. While Dysport is not yet approved for eye wrinkles or under eye wrinkles, it may be used in those areas off-label.
Where can I find Dysport?
Dysport treatments are available at Escobedo Skin Center in Austin, TX, 512.437.9794. “I am excited to offer Dysport to our patients,” said Dr. Michael Escobedo, of Escobedo Skin Center. “I have enjoyed offering Botox injections since the 90’s. My patients absolutely love their improved appearance. I know Dysport has a lot to live up to in the United States, especially when compared to Botox Austin injections. I am confident patients will appreciate Dyport as much as Botox injections. I plan to offer combination therapy with popular fillers such as Juvederm™, Restylane®, Radiesse®, Evolence®, Cosmoplast®, Captique®, Sculptra™, and Silicone for optimum benefits.” Dr. Michael Escobedo strongly believes in offering the most cutting-edge skin care treatment solutions, which is why he is among the first to offer the newly approved Dysport to Central Texans. For more information about Dysport injections, call Escobedo Skin Center at 512-347-9794 or visit EscobedoSkinCenter.com
The Escobedo Skin Center celebrates ten years (2009) of service to Central Texas and offers a variety of skin treatments, including Thermage™ NXT, Vaser Lipo™, Smartlipo MPX™, Fraxel® re:pair, Fraxel® re:store, BOTOX injections, Dysport injections, Restylane®, Perlane®, Evolence®™, Radiesse®, Sculptra™, Epilight™, Photofacial, and Juvéderm™ among others. Dr. Escobedo was one of the first to use Thermage®, Captique™, Photo Dynamic Therapy and IPL (intense pulsed light) to eradicate sun damaged skin, improve skin texture and reduce wrinkles. Dr. Escobedo’s cosmetic and longevity practice is featured in the book about Austin’s high-tech start-up companies: From Waterloo to Silicone Hills: The Story of Austin.
No comments:
Post a Comment